| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
| Subject: | Re: Is it time for triage on the open patches? |
| Date: | 2012-03-10 14:55:49 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa+i_Y0+pLDOzoJ6-8Gh-qAyQg_DLGPhiPzi2-QH+JWBg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> * FOR KEY SHARE locks looks in very good shape and so I'm spending
> time on that with a view to committing it next week if all goes well
Álvaro is a committer and is perfectly capable of committing that
patch for himself, had we consensus on it. So far we don't, and I
don't think you can make a unilateral decision to the contrary. Maybe
that's not what you're proposing, but then what exactly are you
proposing?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-03-10 14:59:23 | Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-10 14:51:11 | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump |