From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: archive modules |
Date: | 2022-02-03 21:04:33 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa+Sp9w2CAkEJ4MuD2sAjePOmVWiYh1yDvVx4P--4ZbUg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 2:27 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 02:11:18PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Committed. I'm going to be 0% surprised if the buildfarm turns pretty
> > colors, but I don't know how to know what it's going to be unhappy
> > about except by trying it, so here goes.
>
> Thanks! I'll keep an eye on the buildfarm and will send any new patches
> that are needed.
Andres just pointed out to me that thorntail is unhappy:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=thorntail&dt=2022-02-03%2019%3A54%3A42
It says:
==~_~===-=-===~_~==
pgsql.build/contrib/basic_archive/log/postmaster.log
==~_~===-=-===~_~==
2022-02-03 23:17:49.019 MSK [1253623:1] FATAL: WAL archival cannot be
enabled when wal_level is "minimal"
The notes for the machine say:
UBSan; force_parallel_mode; wal_level=minimal; OS bug breaks truncate()
So apparently we need to either skip this test when wal_level=minimal,
or force a higher wal_level to be used for this particular test. Not
sure what the existing precedents are, if any.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-02-03 21:11:21 | Re: archive modules |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2022-02-03 20:35:27 | Re: support for CREATE MODULE |