Re: [HACKERS] Replication slots and isolation levels

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Oleksii Kliukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com>
Cc: Vladimir Borodin <root(at)simply(dot)name>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication slots and isolation levels
Date: 2015-10-30 11:30:04
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZzi8-72PksOf8NDBz8nGU97NH_VUgNybxyB_5U_tBBCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Oleksii Kliukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com> wrote:
> Could it be a consequence of how REPEATABLE READ transactions handle
> snapshots? With REPEATABLE READ the snapshot is acquired only once at the
> beginning of a transaction; a READ COMMITTED transaction re-evaluates its
> snapshot with each new command.

I bet that's exactly it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vladimir Borodin 2015-10-30 11:40:23 Re: [HACKERS] Replication slots and isolation levels
Previous Message Jerry Sievers 2015-10-29 18:28:02 Re: PITR using pg_basebackup ERROR

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vladimir Borodin 2015-10-30 11:40:23 Re: [HACKERS] Replication slots and isolation levels
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-10-30 11:26:35 Re: security_barrier view option type mistake in create view document