Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)
Date: 2018-05-10 20:10:18
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZzSJpxjteW=+2HD9SKtmMZJs-VqX+scaMg2HG1qA26pA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Yeah, I had hoped that this might make a noticeable difference on slower
> buildfarm animals, but some testing shows that it's more likely to be
> barely above the noise floor.

Any idea why?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-05-10 20:37:03 Re: Proposal: http2 wire format
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-05-10 20:05:04 Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?