| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GIN over array of ENUMs |
| Date: | 2013-01-14 16:52:54 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZyCktgzQfkHFSNkY_LETUt6AS4+UA5-bwOC4V=+twt+A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> wrote:
> I wish to create this data structure but GIN does not currently support an
> array of ENUM. Is intarray() a good place to look into adding ENUM support
> or is there already an operator class for working supports enums that I
> simply don't see at the moment.
What does intarray have to do with enums?
If you're talking about contrib/intarray, I suspect that's not a
particularly good place to do anything, except maybe rm -rf .
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-01-14 16:55:46 | Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema |
| Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2013-01-14 16:49:49 | Re: pg_ctl idempotent option |