Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc
Date: 2019-06-07 12:51:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZxXR3k=3V2UsQN2EV3VQ455oFJK1+zAn8AzzbO+P9sPg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:48 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached is a patch that applies on top of Robert's pdoldcxt-v1.patch,
> which seems to fix this issue for me.

Yeah, that looks right. I think my patch was full of fuzzy thinking
and inadequate testing; thanks for checking it over and coming up with
the right solution.

Anyone else want to look/comment?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-06-07 12:55:36 Re: Custom table AMs need to include heapam.h because of BulkInsertState
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-06-07 12:43:21 Re: tableam: abstracting relation sizing code