| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump --with-* options |
| Date: | 2025-06-12 17:36:28 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZxMckFy3-hr7wsuz2UwnwrG=vOCdcTxVUVgXdnDtj94w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 11:58 AM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-06-12 at 09:52 -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > If the idea is to remove all options for default behavior, we'd be
> > removing
> > --no-statistics, --with-data, and --with-schema at this point.
>
> That's OK with me.
Same.
> > Maybe we
> > could go a step further and even rip out --statistics-only (in favor
> > of
> > --no-schema --no-data --with-statistics).
>
> I'd probably keep --statistics-only.
I'm going to vote for removing it. pg_dump has a lot of options, and
it doesn't seem like a good bet to me to have options that are
equivalent to various combinations of other options. I don't see any
particular reason to believe that --statistics-only is even a
particularly likely combination of options for someone to want. I'd
rather keep it simple.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-06-12 18:44:21 | Re: queryId constant squashing does not support prepared statements |
| Previous Message | Dimitrios Apostolou | 2025-06-12 17:23:29 | Re: [WIP PATCH v2] Implement "pg_restore --data-only --clean" as a way to skip WAL |