| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM memory management |
| Date: | 2019-12-11 14:29:35 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZw8RSFpDYEnMwxwqkAOo7=yaXFYfF+W5f3tKQXZuBCOg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 2:02 PM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Did you see this thread?
>> https://postgr.es/m/CAGTBQpbDCaR6vv9=scXzuT8fSbckf=a3NgZdWFWZbdVugVht6Q@mail.gmail.com
>>
> Yes, and somehow did what is explained.
Did you modify Claudio's patch or write a totally new one? In either
case, why did you choose that approach? If you wrote a totally new
one, have you compared your work with Claudio's, to see if he covered
anything you might need to cover? Please explain why your patch is
better/different than his.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2019-12-11 14:36:48 | Re: error context for vacuum to include block number |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-12-11 14:28:01 | Re: VACUUM memory management |