From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: eval_const_expresisions and ScalarArrayOpExpr |
Date: | 2017-05-12 17:12:01 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZuyyc0tuvLKu-uFsU72QhNSDiejg7vYSzv8xVoKXh1CA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Actually, I now remember that I wrote that while at Salesforce (because
>>> they'd run into the problem that constant ArrayRef expressions weren't
>>> simplified). So that means it's been languishing in a git branch for
>>> *two* years. I'm kind of inclined to push it before it gets forgotten
>>> again ;-)
>
>> You will probably not be surprised to hear that I think this is a
>> feature and thus subject to the feature freeze currently in effect.
>
> [ shrug ] Sure. I'll do what I should have done then, which is stick
> it into the next CF list.
Thanks.
> If you intend to also object to my proposed get_attstatsslot refactoring,
> please do that promptly. That one I think is bug-proofing.
I wasn't planning to express an opinion on that one.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-05-12 17:12:34 | Re: Hash Functions |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-05-12 17:09:34 | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |