| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status) |
| Date: | 2018-01-10 20:35:33 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZujBb_pqnjVQ-pfDNvHDsmzGyTBbCTacvy49G8EXFG8g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> wrote:
> Is there a notion like that in the pq protocol now? If not, and
> a protocol bump becomes necessary to meet some need, would it be
> worth adding such a notion at the same time, to simplify future
> evolution?
For the fourth time in this thread,
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/ae65f6066dc3d19a55f4fdcd3b30003c5ad8dbed
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-10 20:55:07 | Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-10 20:34:41 | Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status) |