Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam()

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam()
Date: 2023-03-22 13:19:18
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZub-bCg=ORmbcCCbteQ2UQUc14T2GK+v+6-VLd-8yK4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 8:31 AM Aleksander Alekseev
<aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
> The patch needed a rebase due to a4f23f9b. PFA v12.

I have committed this after tidying up a bunch of things in the test
case file that I found too difficult to understand -- or in some cases
just incorrect, like:

elsif ($offnum == 35)
{
- # set xmax to invalid transaction id.
$tup->{t_xmin} = $in_progress_xid;
$tup->{t_infomask} &= ~HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED;
push @expected,

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message torikoshia 2023-03-22 13:34:20 Re: POC PATCH: copy from ... exceptions to: (was Re: VLDB Features)
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2023-03-22 13:15:23 Re: Make EXPLAIN generate a generic plan for a parameterized query