| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |
| Date: | 2021-11-09 19:36:06 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZqvSXb8CV4K0=zH2fDdUJ2dy4Kj2DnwRTR8_2YM=61fA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 4:41 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 11:34 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Anyway, here's my proposal for fixing the issue immediately before us.
> > 0001 adds logic to pad out the unterminated tar archives, and 0002
> > makes the server terminate its tar archives while preserving the logic
> > added by 0001 for cases where we're talking to an older server. I
> > assume that it's best to get something committed quickly here so will
> > do that in ~4 hours if there are no major objections, or sooner if I
> > hear some enthusiastic endorsement.
>
> I have now committed 0001 and will wait to see what the buildfarm
> thinks about that before doing anything more.
It seemed OK, so I have now committed 0002 as well.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-11-09 20:19:37 | Re: 2021-11-11 release announcement draft |
| Previous Message | Floris Van Nee | 2021-11-09 19:28:32 | RE: Commitfest 2021-11 Patch Triage - Part 2 |