Re: let's kill AtSubStart_Notify

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: let's kill AtSubStart_Notify
Date: 2019-10-04 12:25:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZp89UEBqT9tBZOLnK3hHzfyi7q_P6+SFMPUu8sXGXxDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 5:41 AM Jeevan Ladhe
<jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I have reviewed your patch, and it seems correctly implementing the
> actions per subtransactions using stack. Atleast I could not find
> any flaw with your implementation here.

Thanks for the review. Based on this and other positive comments made
on this thread, I have committed the patch.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-10-04 12:33:30 Re: max_parallel_workers question
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-10-04 12:07:42 Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup