Re: RENAME RULE doesn't work with partitioned tables

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RENAME RULE doesn't work with partitioned tables
Date: 2017-04-11 17:20:06
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZp0UGGrka5LAFHp_LzUAHsEh+Q5v6v4BcVXMPRFG-S9A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Just noticed that RangeVarCallbackForRenameRule() was not updated to
> handle partitioned tables, causing the following bug:
>
> create table parted_table (a int) partition by list (a);
> create table part partition of parted_table for values in (1);
> create rule parted_table_insert as on insert to parted_table
> do instead insert into part values (new.*);
> alter rule parted_table_insert on parted_table
> rename to parted_table_insert_redirect;
> -- ERROR: "parted_table" is not a table or view
>
> Attached fixes this and adds a test. Added to open items list.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2017-04-11 17:20:51 Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Previous Message PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2017-04-11 17:20:04 Re: FDW and parallel execution