Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2
Date: 2020-02-05 14:30:22
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZp=wwSJ+f54G69ACXL77MRCO8j9OZhQo1NsaQ01=1cFQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:20 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> So.. We have:
> +1: Vik, Ian, Daniel, Alvaro, Christoph
> +-0: Tom (?), Fabien (?)
> -1: Michael P.

I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it without more plus votes.
If we've actually got a broad consensus on it, sure, but I don't think
4 votes is a broad consensus.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-02-05 14:32:36 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-02-05 14:28:08 Re: Is custom MemoryContext prohibited?