Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <iliv(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch
Date: 2013-11-08 20:12:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZodUpRLYF2fOjaQS7KZFQRWvaYpxzUKcLG1HRP2_1Wig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> superuser privileges; it's the selective-dump case where you can often
>>>> get by without them. I've attached a proposed patch along these lines
>>>> for your consideration.
>>> That's fair.
>> Should I go ahead and apply that portion, then?
> I am certainly not opposed.

OK, done.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2013-11-08 20:13:46 Re: regclass error reports improperly downcased
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-11-08 20:11:17 Re: Minmax indexes