Re: Enhancing Memory Context Statistics Reporting

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Enhancing Memory Context Statistics Reporting
Date: 2026-01-14 13:26:24
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZndbmJqDR9-qPbhJ-9e07CnLuLy6xzrtRnGmgeQaBg1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 4:47 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that doesn't generally happen. There's promotion to FATAL if
> the top-level sigsetjmp() hasn't yet run (c.f. the check for
> PG_exception_stack in errstart()), but once it has been reached, it stays
> configured.

All right, then I guess I don't fully understand how the
error-outside-of-a-transaction case is handled. But I still think that
code like this needs to run in a transaction to avoid unexpected and
undesirable results. Do you see it differently?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2026-01-14 13:32:36 Re: Enhancing Memory Context Statistics Reporting
Previous Message Kirill Reshke 2026-01-14 13:04:31 Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support