Re: pageinspect: Hash index support

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pageinspect: Hash index support
Date: 2017-02-09 19:36:36
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZn8BDOf=5Z8cWKJCg59ytk2o4ur54YPdqzbvHhSva7Ew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think you should just tighten up the sanity checking in the existing
>> function _hash_ovflblkno_to_bitno rather than duplicating the code. I
>> don't think it's called often enough for one extra (cheap) test to be
>> an issue. (You should change the elog in that function to an ereport,
>> too, since it's going to be a user-facing error message now.)
>
> okay, I have taken care of above two points in the attached patch. Thanks.

Alright, committed with a little further hacking. That would rejected
using hash_bitmap_info() on primary bucket pages and the metapage, but
not on bitmap pages, which seems weird. So I fixed that and pushed
this.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-02-09 19:40:27 Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Previous Message Rui Pacheco 2017-02-09 19:27:17 Re: How to debug the wire protocol?