| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Stop ALTER SYSTEM from making bad assumptions |
| Date: | 2019-08-05 18:23:02 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZmSQCta7eN_Y2+U4LthMxcutGB+YXs+0-i6ND2JY0TRA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 1:29 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> No, that isn't the point of the controversy nor does it relate, at all,
> to what you quoted above, so I don't think there's much value in
> responding to the discussion about WARNING or not that you put together
> below.
Well, if that's not what we're arguing about, then what the heck are
we arguing about?
All we need to do to resolve this issue is have Tom commit his patch.
The set of people who are objecting to that is either {} or {Stephen
Frost}. Even if it's the latter, we should just proceed, because
there are clearly enough votes in favor of the patch to proceed,
including 2 from RMT members, and if it's the former, we should
DEFINITELY proceed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2019-08-05 18:24:03 | Re: [PATCH] Stop ALTER SYSTEM from making bad assumptions |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-08-05 18:11:46 | Re: [PATCH] Stop ALTER SYSTEM from making bad assumptions |