| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com" <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers |
| Date: | 2022-06-09 13:23:12 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZmRAkOgNzSqRxzJ=Kok_NYHZ57X2ZKRh=cfoCukp4f_Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 7:53 PM Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
> But I don't have any better ideas for how to achieve both. I'm fine
> with your suggestion of ClientConnectionInfo, if that sounds good to
> others; the doc comment can clarify why it differs from Port? Or add
> one of the Shared-/Gang-/Group- prefixes to it, maybe?
I don't like the prefixes, so I'd prefer explaining it in the struct comment.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-06-09 13:33:53 | Re: |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2022-06-09 12:55:46 | Re: Error from the foreign RDBMS on a foreign table I have no privilege on |