| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The pgrminclude problem |
| Date: | 2012-08-20 19:22:04 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZm3dKHCWmvfDVwj6B6zkDYWRNSXUDR_7=+zrbTEvhMJQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun ago 20 11:43:44 -0400 2012:
>> I actually think we'd probably be better off running pgrminclude once
>> per release cycle rather than any less often. When the number of
>> changes gets into the hundreds or thousands of lines it becomes much
>> more difficult to validate that it's doing anything sensible. I ran
>> it a while back and found a bunch of stuff that looked like it was
>> obviously worth fixing, but I was afraid of getting yelled at if I
>> went and fixed it, so I didn't. Somehow that doesn't seem like an
>> ideal situation...
>
> Alternatively you could post a patch for comment.
Yeah, maybe I'll try that if I get back around to working on this at some point.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-08-20 19:32:45 | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-08-20 19:19:59 | Re: Large number of open(2) calls with bulk INSERT into empty table |