Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
Date: 2013-07-23 14:35:12
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZkakb+fLqW9UhJLqaq2KrkKzHO5YB6nMJXGzJArcjAJQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 7/23/13 9:06 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> But just BTW, you kind of messed up that CommitFest entry. The link you
>> added as a new version of the
>> patch was actually to a different patch from the same flock.
>
> Fixed now, since I find myself looking back through history on submissions
> often enough to care about it being right. My eyes were starting to glaze
> over by the end of staring at this "flock".

Cool.

I'm pretty sure that's the correct collective noun for patches. Right?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-07-23 14:56:29 Re: Design proposal: fsync absorb linear slider
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-07-23 14:34:21 Re: improve Chinese locale performance