Re: TOAST table created for partitioned tables

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TOAST table created for partitioned tables
Date: 2018-03-22 17:51:26
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZjdeQxdtO0i4okaPT_bPtpFZMOE++N-em4Jpr0Lf-dSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:03 AM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:38:58PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Yeah, pg_upgrade already has to cope with cases where the newer version
>>> thinks a table needs a toast table when the older version didn't, or
>>> vice versa. This looks like it ought to fall into that category.
>>> Not that testing it wouldn't be a good idea.
>>
>> As far as I can see this statement is true. If you create a parent
>> partition table in a v10 cluster, and then upgrade to HEAD with this
>> patch applied, you'll be able to notice that the relation still has its
>> toast table present, while newly-created parent partitions would have
>> nothing. (Just tested, I didn't review the patch in details).
>
> Thanks for checking. I too checked that pg_upgrading v10 cluster
> containing partitioned tables that have a TOAST table attached to it
> works normally and like Michael says, the TOAST table remains.

I have committed your patch.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message legrand legrand 2018-03-22 18:16:30 Re: [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans (v02)
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2018-03-22 17:38:39 Re: Re: csv format for psql