| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 |
| Date: | 2017-11-28 17:41:34 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZjDagOA+wH8eoN4bvUbudyYBgr+ar__RQxksOU-dzkDQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I also wonder whether there should be a mechanism to turn off channel
> binding from the client. Right now, there is no way to test the
> non-PLUS mechanism in an SSL build.
I think that would be a good thing to have.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-28 17:49:29 | Re: documentation is now XML |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-11-28 17:35:00 | Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-28 22:08:44 | Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-11-28 16:10:25 | Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 |