| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 花田茂 <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Hooking at standard_join_search (Was: Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual) |
| Date: | 2015-09-11 16:43:14 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZj8V7zfB7gVTAVzjfN=cNSK+sGWWr06v5Xf64YTh6W7w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> So, information to address the how-to-build-the-query-text
> problem would be stored in the state, in other words. Right?
Right.
>> I am not sure what to do about parameterizations. That's one of my
>> remaining concerns about moving the hook.
>
> I think we should also make it clear what to do about sort orderings.
How does that come into it?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | YUriy Zhuravlev | 2015-09-11 16:46:02 | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-09-11 16:42:01 | Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual |