Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement
Date: 2017-10-18 17:17:33
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZibLmR-u41m_df=82MaUwm-ytMHohBhB1atP-7UcS2Kg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> On 08/06/2014 08:37 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>>
>> But now it looks like 0002 needs a rebase....
>
> I've committed the refactoring patch, and here's a rebased and improved
> version of the Windows SChannel implementation over that.
>
> Server-side support is now implemented too, but it's all very crude and
> work-in-progress. CRLs are not supported, intermediary CAs are not
> supported, and probably many other bells and whistles are missing too. But
> the basics work, including cert authentication. Consider this a Proof of
> Concept.

Heikki, do you have any plans to work more on this?

Or does anyone else?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-10-18 17:18:20 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement table partitioning.
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2017-10-18 17:06:42 Re: SIGSEGV in BRIN autosummarize