| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node |
| Date: | 2017-11-10 03:06:39 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZhmR1PWWPvGXGk1veksXfNqoB_euKJxWTqhuBviYfMzA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Have you set force_parallel_mode=regress; before running the
> statement?
Yes, I tried that first.
> If so, then why you need to tune other parallel query
> related parameters?
Because I couldn't get it to break the other way, I then tried this.
Instead of asking me what I did, can you tell me what I need to do?
Maybe a self-contained reproducible test case including exactly what
goes wrong on your end?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2017-11-10 03:30:00 | Re: path toward faster partition pruning |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-10 02:50:50 | Re: Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal of superuser() checks |