Re: Re: Use procsignal_sigusr1_handler and RecoveryConflictInterrupt() from walsender?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Use procsignal_sigusr1_handler and RecoveryConflictInterrupt() from walsender?
Date: 2016-11-22 02:39:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZh6M5bTmtZZm1vBpFGHmeNgESe4UrJ3-OwKnu56SKB7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm still interested in hearing comments from experienced folks about
> whether it's sane to do this at all, rather than have similar
> duplicate signal handling for the walsender.

Well, I mean, if it's reasonable to share code in a given situation,
that is generally better than NOT sharing code...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-11-22 02:46:14 Re: Danger of automatic connection reset in psql
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-11-22 02:20:29 Re: Logical decoding on standby