| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value? |
| Date: | 2025-10-09 15:03:19 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZg8h6ChvG_rFfLa0oECQNc7x46Es7WEJWz=EeOgobQ_w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 10:47 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> wrote:
> I agree with this. But isn't this a mostly orthogonal problem? I mean,
> shouldn't we do both (or try to)?
>
> Also, if users complain about A and not about B, does that mean B is not
> an issue?
>
> Isn't ignoring "B" a bit like that? Of course, maybe B really is not
> worth worrying about. Or maybe this is not the right approach to address
> it, I don't know.
I'm just telling you what I think. I'm not purporting to have all of
the right answers.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mircea Cadariu | 2025-10-09 15:04:46 | Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-10-09 14:58:02 | Re: memory leak in dbase_redo() |