Re: Parallel Seq Scan

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date: 2015-10-16 12:01:23
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZf_8UXEG0HPaLaL_5yveOhVnkH4f0C0KZ+j3ZH0_AbjQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think due to above changes it will report sync location on each page
> scan, don't we want to report it once at end of scan?

I think reporting for each page is correct. Isn't that what the
non-parallel case does?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-10-16 12:03:11 Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2015-10-16 11:42:30 Re: Parallel Seq Scan