| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Arjen Nienhuis <a(dot)g(dot)nienhuis(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch for bug #12845 (GB18030 encoding) |
| Date: | 2015-05-06 16:25:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZdi1qveeH-0uUbNJx5iFk+qgZOjHFetA2nR8rgmEhRRw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> It's a behavior change, so I don't think we would consider a back-patch.
>
> Maybe not, but at the very least we should consider getting it fixed in
> 9.5 rather than waiting a full development cycle. Same as in
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150428131549.GA25925@momjian.us
> I'm not saying we MUST include it in 9.5, but we should at least
> consider it. If we simply stash it in the open CF we guarantee that it
> will linger there for a year.
Sure, if somebody has the time to put into it now, I'm fine with that.
I'm afraid it won't be me, though: even if I had the time, I don't
know enough about encodings.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-06 16:54:01 | Re: Manipulating complex types as non-contiguous structures in-memory |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-06 15:20:07 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |