Re: [HACKERS] parallel.c oblivion of worker-startup failures

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] parallel.c oblivion of worker-startup failures
Date: 2017-12-06 17:06:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZb+ZfFsfaEv4O_R6Ej7FdR1Es3_0AdEMKHJ5WSn5S5Sw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Maybe track "worker is known to have launched" in the leader's state
> someplace?

That's probably one piece of it, yes.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-12-06 17:08:15 Re: Postgres with pthread
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-12-06 17:04:12 Re: views