Re: WIP: Failover Slots

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Failover Slots
Date: 2016-01-21 16:31:03
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZam8QYYsP=u44pQiF+wqMVzWZrTsYWvQ_Okju65SsxxQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Failover Slots
> In the current patch, any slot defined on a master will generate WAL,
> leading to a pending-slot being present on all standby nodes. When a standby
> is promoted, the slot becomes usable and will have the properties as of the
> last fsync on the master.

No objection to the concept, but I think the new behavior needs to be
optional. I am guessing that you are thinking along similar lines,
but it's not explicitly called out here.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-01-21 16:33:17 Re: Set search_path + server-prepared statements = cached plan must not change result type
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2016-01-21 16:28:40 Re: removal of unused argument in ginInsertCleanup()