| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jordan Gigov <coladict(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering? |
| Date: | 2017-07-27 18:58:58 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZZXEHpz_pKOSfArkWpU6WDd55NoV8=1-sNiZxY1kqMzQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The bigger issue is whether there's some failure case this would cause
> that I'm missing altogether. Thoughts?
I think dependencies are fundamentally the right model for this sort
of problem. I can't imagine what could go wrong that wouldn't amount
to a failure to insert all of the right dependencies, and thus be
fixable by inserting whatever was missing.
It's possible I am lacking in imagination, so take that opinion for
what it's worth.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Rofail | 2017-07-27 19:08:51 | Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-07-27 18:46:22 | Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows |