Re: [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes.
Date: 2017-04-01 01:35:24
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZYcAJx5xWLp-Q1wuhCYZerYZxbStiAfu7QqCDOmmbpzQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks, I have tried to fix all of the comments.

Thanks.

Hmm, don't the changes to contrib/pageinspect/expected/hash.out
indicate that you've broken something? The hash index has only 4
buckets, so the new code shouldn't be doing anything differently, but
you've got highmask and lowmask changing for some reason.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2017-04-01 01:36:09 Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in _hash_kill_items/MarkBufferDirtyHint
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-04-01 01:30:17 Re: logical replication launcher crash on buildfarm