On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Seems like a good idea, but the way you've written it is inconsistent
> with the "n/m" notation used just above. I'd suggest
>
> ... latency limit: 33 (33/33, 100.000 %)
>
> or just
>
> ... latency limit: 33/33 (100.000 %)
Oh, yeah. That last one sounds good; no reason to print the same
value more than once.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company