| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Too many autovacuum workers spawned during forced auto-vacuum |
| Date: | 2017-01-20 21:28:20 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZXYwoMJ+7Fn8Yj_ZR1ui8ODoBdYiZ78WeLGC6o8odWNw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:11 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>>> After sleeping on this, I'm inclined to go with Amit's fix for now.
>>> It seems less likely to break anything in the back-branches than any
>>> other option I can think up.
>>
>> Yeah, no objections here.
>
> +1.
OK, committed and back-patched all the way.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-01-20 21:29:45 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-01-20 21:25:18 | Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |