Re: wait event documentation

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: wait event documentation
Date: 2017-04-04 12:05:58
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZX2e36sCut+2b1Zb2MLTwhWSkOebxVOA18zEr0gMGxpw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> By the way, wonder if it wouldn't make sense to take the whole Table 28.1.
> Dynamic Statistics Views into a new section (perhaps before 28.2 Viewing
> Locks or after), since those views display information different from what
> the statistics collector component collects and publishes (those in the
> Table 28.2. Collected Statistics Views).

It seems a little short for that, doesn't it? I mean, I'm not against
it on principle, but we don't want to hoist a 5-line table into a
section by itself.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2017-04-04 12:17:43 Re: wait event documentation
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-04-04 12:01:32 Re: Parallel Append implementation