| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option |
| Date: | 2022-07-01 02:21:53 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZWWqB66t4K6Mqv6TDttO1YJRJhOJO77B5H9Z8f28yc8Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 7:29 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> IIUC you are suggesting that we'd leave rolinherit in pg_authid alone, but
> we'd add the ability to specify a grant-level option that would always take
> precedence. The default (WITH INHERIT DEFAULT) would cause things to work
> exactly as they do today (i.e., use rolinherit). Does this sound right?
Yeah, that could be an alternative to the patch I proposed previously.
What do you (and others) think of that idea?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-07-01 02:33:28 | Re: margay fails assertion in stats/dsa/dsm code |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-07-01 01:41:55 | Re: Issue with pg_stat_subscription_stats |