Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maksim Milyutin <m(dot)milyutin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Date: 2017-03-29 14:58:05
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZVyd4u4ks6MLUNPgZ3nGYhXvNZY_8RS_tq7edh5P1drQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Looks correct, so incorporated in the attached updated patch. Thanks.

This seems like a hacky way to limit the reloptions to just OIDs.
Shouldn't we instead have a new RELOPT_KIND_PARTITIONED or something
like that?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-03-29 15:05:13 Re: Monitoring roles patch
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-03-29 14:50:07 Re: [sqlsmith] Unpinning error in parallel worker