Re: block-level incremental backup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: block-level incremental backup
Date: 2019-09-03 14:39:11
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZV_4MsntAEp-R77nKnTPvUQc-C=kD=xp-Md0xrO-f1fw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:05 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> +1 using the library to tar. But I think reason not using tar library is TAR is
> one of the most simple file format. What is the best/newest format of TAR?

So, I don't really want to go down this path at all, as I already
said. You can certainly do your own research on this topic if you
wish.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-09-03 15:00:22 Re: block-level incremental backup
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2019-09-03 14:21:30 Re: Locking a row with KEY SHARE NOWAIT blocks