| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Étienne BERSAC <etienne(dot)bersac(at)dalibo(dot)com>, ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com, rafaelthca(at)gmail(dot)com, jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query |
| Date: | 2024-03-04 18:19:45 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZVYG+Ot=yPg3HAr2H=2fPvQOyahrx5qwaRf5cqkM7PAQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 10:46 AM James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If I can rephrase this idea: it's basically "delay this interrupt
> until inline to the next ExecProcNode execution".
Yes, but it's not just that. It also means that the code which would
handle the interrupt doesn't need to be called at every ExecProcNode.
Only when the interrupt actually arrives do we enable the code that
handles it.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2024-03-04 18:33:55 | Re: Tidy fill hstv array (src/backend/access/heap/pruneheap.c) |
| Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2024-03-04 18:08:03 | Re: Avoid is possible a expensive function call (src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c) |