Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Date: 2018-07-18 10:42:10
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZU9nBd6m3NQohzjpdvBNtw+6UGoz+uqoaawkXy76gYSg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, we'd be getting rid of it because of a danger of data loss which we
> can't otherwise mitigate. Maybe it does need to be backpatched, even if we
> haven't had complaints.

What's wrong with the approach proposed in
http://postgr.es/m/55AFC302.1060805@iki.fi ?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2018-07-18 12:00:41 Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-07-18 10:36:12 Re: untrusted PLs should be GRANTable