Re: Non-superuser subscription owners

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Date: 2023-03-23 19:39:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZU8RPi6j=WCbMD3KyeqbVQWUhbjtaNw0zN8nO-spz4kQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 1:41 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> Even if my changes don't happen, I would find it less confusing and
> more likely that users understand what they're doing.

I respectfully but firmly disagree. I think having two predefined
roles that are both required to create a subscription and neither of
which allows you to do anything other than create a subscription is
intrinsically confusing. I'm not willing to commit a patch that works
like that, and I will object if someone else wants to do so.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2023-03-23 19:40:45 Re: doc: add missing "id" attributes to extension packaging page
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-03-23 19:37:15 Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam()