Re: A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition()

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition()
Date: 2017-08-03 18:29:23
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZSsyAgPmYwN76bzR60q=8fuB1+4s2smCZ7s8-Q5WwVKQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Alright, attached updated 0001 does that.

Committed 0001 and 0002. 0003 needs a rebase.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2017-08-03 18:38:18 Re: Add Roman numeral conversion to to_number
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2017-08-03 18:24:58 Re: pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization