Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()
Date: 2015-12-10 19:56:33
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZQiQ1JDfieFXaPPMtX7iG3N9fKf6=8vvOC25Wa58VCUQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> This patch, or something nearby, seems to have changed the number of
>> significant figures produced by log() and maybe some of the other
>> functions this patch touched.
>
> Yeah, not surprising.
>
>> It's certainly not obvious from the commit message that this change
>> was expected.
>
> That's on me as author of the commit message, I guess. The rscale
> in most of these functions is exactly the number of fraction digits
> that will be emitted, and we changed the rules for computing it.
> Not by much, in most cases. I don't think we should be too worried
> about being bug-compatible with the old behavior.

It seems to be a loss of 4 digits in every case I've seen.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-12-10 20:02:13 Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()
Previous Message Caleb Welton 2015-12-10 19:47:51 Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita