Re: lo_manage trigger on updates

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lo_manage trigger on updates
Date: 2011-10-10 17:18:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZQEbFFRR9X25azdBMpWcYx6RDncTODF0hOcR9GYRz0dw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think the doc section about using lo_manage() as a trigger:
>   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/lo.html
>
> could have its example tweaked to use a column-level BEFORE UPDATE
> trigger, so as to save unnecessary trigger firings. Something like the
> attached, perhaps?

Uh, wow. That syntax is horribly surprising, isn't it? My eyes want
to parse it as:

BEFORE (UPDATE OF raster) OR (DELETE ON image)

...which is totally wrong.

I'm inclined to think that maybe we should leave that example as-is,
and maybe add the variant you're proposing as a second example,
showing how the basic version can be refined.

> On a similar note, the warning on that page about truncates could be
> softened if we extended the lo_manage() function to handle truncates,
> and set it up as on ON TRUNCATE trigger as well.

Patch? :-)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-10-10 17:27:26 Re: Small correction in http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/wal-reliability.html
Previous Message Thom Brown 2011-10-10 17:15:36 Re: Link to PAM pages broken