From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
Date: | 2018-03-02 16:36:50 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZPRfMqZoK_Fbo_tD9OH9PdPFcPBsi-sdGZ6Jg8OMM2PA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:44 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> And even more so, I'm not even sure it makes sense to try to get this
> into v11. This is a medium-large complicated feature, submitted to the
> last CF for v11. That's pretty late. Now, Magnus is a committer, but
> nevertheless...
Yeah, I would also favor bumping this one out to a later release. I
think there is a significant risk either that the design is flawed --
and as evidence, I offer that I found a flaw in it which I noticed
only because of a passing remark in an email, not because I opened the
patch -- or that the design boxes us into a corner such that it will
be hard to improve this later. I think that there are is a good
chance that there are other serious problems with this patch and to be
honest I don't really want to go try to find them right this minute; I
want to work on other patches that were submitted earlier and have
been waiting for a long time.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-03-02 16:42:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Early locking option to parallel backup |
Previous Message | Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski | 2018-03-02 16:30:48 | All Taxi Services need Index Clustered Heap Append |