| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: What to name the current heap after pluggable storage / what to rename? |
| Date: | 2019-01-11 17:01:36 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZOzjXVMk5=arOaL4qe+Ma7JwpsJD-08EddBcmVkDq-Fw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:05 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> ISTM that the first block would best belong into new files like
> access/rel[ation].h and access/common/rel[ation].h.
+1.
> I think the second
> set should be renamed to be table_open() (with backward compat
> redirects, there's way way too many references) and should go into
> access/table.h access/table/table.c alongside tableam.[ch],
Sounds reasonable.
> but I could
> also see just putting them into relation.[ch].
I would view that as a less-preferred alternative, but not crazy.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-01-11 17:02:22 | Re: Remove all "INTERFACE ROUTINES" style comments |
| Previous Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2019-01-11 16:51:32 | Re: Feature: temporary materialized views |