Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]" <KBaker9(at)its(dot)jnj(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL
Date: 2014-08-20 16:25:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZOY=ksovamsPyBHUt76gbDH_19XZzf_Lkcw2Am9izBOA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]
<KBaker9(at)its(dot)jnj(dot)com> wrote:
> My proof of concept code (steps a though e below) avoided any reading or writing to the pipe (and associated handling of SIGPIPE), it just relied on postmaster open of PIPE with ENXIO to indicate all is clear.

I'm not following.

> Robert, Assuming an algorithm choice is agreed upon in the near future, would you be the logical choice to implement the change?
> I am happy to help, especially with any QNX-specific aspects, but don't want to step on anyone's toes.

I'm unlikely to have time to work on this in the immediate future, but
I may be able to help review.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mayeul Kauffmann 2014-08-20 16:56:06 Re: Patching for increasing the number of columns
Previous Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-08-20 16:02:03 Re: [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED